Value based care moved from pilot program to mandatory federal policy in 2026. CMS launched mandatory bundled and risk based payment models covering roughly 700 hospitals and 200 plus urban specialty markets, restructured primary care billing codes to reward outcomes over visit counts, and introduced payment adjustments that penalize practices that do not participate. If you run a billing company, the way your clients get paid is changing. Your billing workflows, coding requirements, compliance tracking, and denial management processes need to change with it.
That is the bottom line. Fee for service is not disappearing tomorrow, but CMS is building the payment infrastructure to move away from it at an accelerating pace. The billing companies that understand what is coming and adapt their operations will keep their clients. The ones that keep running volume based workflows on a system designed for outcomes based payment will lose them.
From prospected payment systems to merit-based payment systems and two value based programs, I watched every previous CMS payment model shift play out the same way. The announcement comes. The industry waits. The deadline hits. And billing companies that did not prepare spend the next 18 months scrambling to catch up while their clients absorb the financial damage. This time, the models are mandatory. There is no waiting period. The shift is here.
What Is Driving the 2026 Shift
Three forces converged to make 2026 a genuine inflection point rather than another incremental step.
The 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule recalibrates incentives away from high volume episodic care toward longitudinal, outcomes based models. This is not a tweak. It is a structural change in how Medicare pays for care, and it accelerates the move to risk bearing arrangements in traditional Medicare, not just Medicare Advantage.
The value based care payment market reflects this momentum. It grew from $3.17 billion in 2025 to a projected $5.02 billion by 2030 at a 9.5% compound annual growth rate. The money is flowing toward outcomes based payment. Billing companies that cannot process these payment structures will be left processing a shrinking pool of traditional fee for service claims.
And the tools to support this transition now exist. AI and analytics matured to the point where predictive risk stratification, quality measure tracking, and population health management are operationally viable for small and mid size practices. The technology barrier that previously kept value based care as an enterprise only play has dropped.
The Three Mandatory Models You Need to Understand
CMS introduced three models that signal where reimbursement is heading. Two are mandatory. One restructures primary care billing codes in ways that affect every practice you serve.
TEAM (Transforming Episode Accountability Model) is a five year mandatory bundled payment model running from 2026 through 2030, covering roughly 700 hospitals. It bundles 30 day episodes for joint replacement, hip fracture repair, spinal fusion, CABG, and major bowel procedures into a single risk adjusted target price payment covering all Part A and Part B billing. Two sided risk phases in after year one, meaning hospitals that exceed the target price will owe money back to CMS.
For billing companies, TEAM creates a fundamentally different claims processing challenge. You are no longer billing individual line items for each service within an episode. You are allocating a single bundled payment accurately across multiple providers and services per payer rules. That requires tracking every service delivered within the 30 day episode window, reconciling payments against the target price, and managing the risk adjustment calculations that determine the final payment amount.
ASM (Ambulatory Specialty Model) starts January 2027, targeting specialists treating heart failure and low back pain in 200 plus urban markets. It replaces MIPS reporting with quality and cost based Part B payment adjustments that can swing plus 9%, neutral, or minus 9% on the specialist’s Medicare reimbursement. It also mandates formal collaboration agreements between specialists and primary care physicians.
For billing companies serving specialty practices, ASM means your denial management and compliance tracking workflows need to account for quality measure reporting that directly affects payment rates. Miss a quality benchmark, and your client’s Medicare reimbursement drops 9%. That is not a denial. That is a payment adjustment built into the model, and it hits whether your claims are clean or not.
APCM (Advanced Primary Care Management) restructures primary care billing codes using bundled monthly payments tied to patient attribution rather than visit count. This is the first scalable value based payment model for primary care. Rather than billing per visit, practices receive monthly payments based on the patients attributed to them, alongside restructured RPM and CCM codes that reward ongoing engagement over one time enrollment.
For billing companies serving primary care practices, APCM changes what you bill, how you bill it, and what documentation supports it. Patient attribution tracking replaces visit based scheduling as the driver of revenue. Your coding team needs to understand the new code structures. Your claim submission workflows need to handle monthly bundled payments alongside traditional fee for service claims. And your reporting needs to track engagement metrics that determine whether the attributed payments continue.
How This Changes Your Billing Operation
Value based reimbursement does not just add new billing codes. It changes the operational complexity of running a billing company in three specific ways.
First, documentation and coding burden increases materially. A single episode under TEAM may involve multiple providers, treatments, and outcome assessments that must all be captured accurately. A single missed code can mean lost revenue on the bundled payment. Under ASM, quality measure documentation must be nonstop, not episodic. Under APCM, patient engagement metrics must be tracked and reported monthly. Your coding team needs training on these new structures, and they need it before the models take effect.
Second, claim denial management becomes more complex under value based models. Claims are more prone to denial under these newer, less standardized billing structures. Payers and CMS are still refining adjudication rules for bundled payments. Denial reason codes for value based claims do not always map cleanly to the CARC categories your team knows. And the appeal process for a bundled payment denial is fundamentally different from appealing a single line item claim.
Third, compliance tracking adds load that most billing companies are not staffed for. MIPS type quality measure reporting and its ASM successor require nonstop monitoring. Non compliance triggers audits, penalties, and negative payment adjustments. For a billing company managing 15 to 25 client practices, tracking quality measures across every provider, every patient, and every payer is a data management challenge that manual processes cannot handle.
Risk Adjustment Is Tightening
A dynamic in 2026 that billing companies need to watch: Medicare Advantage plans are tightening risk adjustment scrutiny. HCC coding that is not backed by demonstrable patient outcomes is increasingly a compliance and reimbursement risk rather than a revenue lever.
This is a fundamental shift. For years, risk adjustment coding was treated as a revenue optimization activity. Document the diagnosis. Code the HCC. Capture the risk score. Receive the higher payment. The documentation supported the code, and the code supported the payment.
Now, CMS and Medicare Advantage plans are asking whether the documentation supports not just the code, but the outcome. Did the patient’s care plan address the documented condition? Did outcomes improve? Is there evidence of ongoing clinical engagement, or was the diagnosis documented once and never acted on?
For billing companies, this means risk adjustment coding requires coordination with clinical teams, not just coders. The billing company that codes HCCs without verifying that the practice is documenting outcomes and care plans for those conditions is creating audit exposure for its clients.
What HARRIS CareTracker Provides for This Transition
The billing companies that will succeed in value-based care need a platform that supports bundled payment reconciliation, quality measure tracking, and risk adjustment documentation alongside traditional fee for service claim submission. Running these models on fragmented technology is not viable. The data complexity is too high.
HARRIS CareTracker was built as a unified platform where practice management, EHR, billing, and analytics sit in a single environment. For billing companies managing the transition to value-based care, this means patient attribution data, clinical documentation, quality measures, and claim submission all flow through one system. No manual reconciliation between platforms. No data gaps between the clinical record and the billing workflow.
Chronic Care Management and Remote Patient Monitoring capabilities are built into the platform, supporting the restructured RPM and CCM codes under APCM. Population health tools support risk stratification and patient engagement tracking. And the revenue cycle management infrastructure, batch eligibility verification 270/271, automated claim scrubbing, claim denial management workflows, and real time dashboards, continues to handle the fee for service claims that still make up the majority of revenue while value-based payment grows alongside it.
The transition to value-based care is not a single switch. It is a gradual shift where both models run in parallel for years. Your platform needs to handle both. HARRIS CareTracker does.
What percentage of your client practices are currently affected by TEAM, ASM, or APCM? And is your billing infrastructure ready for what those models require?
Follow for more on revenue cycle management, value based care billing, and building operations that adapt.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the TEAM bundled payment model and how does it affect billing companies?
How does the ASM model change specialty billing?
What is APCM and why does it matter for primary care billing?
How is risk adjustment coding changing under Medicare Advantage in 2026?
Can a billing company with 1 to 50 employees manage value based care models?
About the Author
Thomas Koehl is a 30 year health technology veteran and currently Director of Marketing at Harris CareTracker. Prior leadership roles at QRS Healthcare Solutions focused on supporting revenue cycle management partners. Following Hurricane Katrina, he served as Director of a large New Orleans medical clinic that delivered care to over 32,000 patients. Koehl has testified before the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce as an expert witness on disaster healthcare delivery. He also volunteers as COO of International Medical Alliance, a nonprofit providing free medical care to impoverished communities in developing countries. He writes about the business, strategy, and human side of health technology for the practitioners and leaders living it day to day.
Follow me here for more breakdowns, and follow HARRIS CareTracker for product updates and resources.
